Integrity Score 390
No Records Found
No Records Found
A Future China Strategy for India
The second mistake made while choosing to make the McMahon
Line the unilaterally-decided international Indo-Tibet boundary was that India did not take the necessary steps to give it legal validity, which
it could have, since the opportunity existed. India could easily have
declared its recognition of Tibet’s independence at any time in the
period from 15 August 1947, when India became independent, to
March 1950, when the PLA first entered eastern Kham.
It was possible to do so even afterwards, between then and October 1950, but that
required a harder mindset that was not hell-bent upon appeasing China
for the sake of Asian solidarity or Nehru’s own personal image in the
international arena. Had India recognized Tibet’s independence then,
the McMahon Line would automatically have become legally valid,
even without China’s agreeing to it, and questions of whether their
representative Chen I-fan had or did not have the authority to sign
would have become redundant.
India was not a totally naiive ‘babe in the woods’ in the field of geo-
politics and international relations during this period. We have already
seen how it had in 1949-50 actively considered the question of military
intervention in Tibet, and of supplying arms to the Tibetans, as per
their request. It was dealing directly with the Tibetan government as an
independent country.
It had also sent a young officer in 1949 to recce the routes from India into Tibet in case Indian military intervention
was decided on. Nehru was annoyed with the Tibetan government for
not accepting India’s inheritance of British India’s treaty rights in Tibet,
but had India declared its recognition of Tibet’s independence, in all
probability Tibet would have accepted this assertion. The McMahon
Line would also have automatically have acquired legal validity. And the
Chinese occupation of Tibet in 1950-51 would also automatically have
become illegal. But this solution would have not made Nehru into a
‘world statesman’ as a ‘good friend of China’
To be continued...