Integrity Score 240
No Records Found
Sankaracharya Sri Jeyendra Sarasvati and his Deputy Sri Vijayendra Saraswati of the Kanchi Mutt were acquitted in 2013. Another thing, the person who was allegedly murdered had accused the Mutt of malpractices and misuse of funds. An interesting piece of information which begs not to be left out.
Also, ‘secularism as a one-way obligation of Hindus.’? I’m yet to hear any representatives of a temple come out in support of Christians who are being persecuted on the false allegation of ‘forced conversions’. The Muslims who are being lynched under false accusations of trading in beef. The silence is deafening and telling too. Rather hypocritical. I seldom resort to refutation but this requires it.
Wait I just read the mention of Indian identity and in the text you're talking about something else.
Isn't that a bit misleading?
Introduction
The Concept of an Indian Identity and Mindset continues..
Now the target is the Hindu institutions and Hindu icons; and the route is not the creation of a comprador class to subdue the nation, but is the fostering of a psychological milieu to denigrate the heritage and to delink the Hindu from his past legacy thereby causing a loss of self-esteem and of pride in the nation’s past. There are already many examples of this happening.
A false murder case was foisted on the Acharyas of the 2500 year old Kanchi Mutt. Most Hindus have watched it as spectators, and with nagging doubts about the truth, and in fact about the Acharyas themselves. The Supreme Court has however held that the case has “no worthwhile prima facie evidence…” [Court records: (2005) 2 Supreme Court Cases 13, para 12, page 20] and that the alleged confessions of other accused persons implicating the Acharyas “have very little evidentiary value” [para 10]. The case thus is without basis and is bogus because since then the Tamil Nadu police has failed to uncover any further or new evidence to sustain the case. That the apex Court has found the foisted case as without prima facie merit should itself have galvanized the people against the offending authorities. It has not, because Hindus lack the mindset and guidance to retaliate against the willful and disguised defamation of Hindu symbols and institutions. Instead like parrots, most Hindus mouth the phrase that “law must take its course”. Where is the law in this? Nor did a single Muslim or Christian organization or their leaders condemn this atrocity, exposing secularism as a one-way obligation of Hindus.
That the obvious perpetrator of this blasphemous atrocity on a hoary institution of the Hindus, was the head of the Tamil Nadu state government, one who also claims to be a good Hindu because she regularly visits temples, has only helped to further confound the already confused Hindu mind from responding.
to be continued...
( This account is maintained by Har Anand Publication))